How does perfect competition maximize profits

The answer is that shutting down can reduce variable costs to zero, but in the short run, the firm has already paid for fixed costs. As a result, if the firm produces a quantity of zero, it would still make losses because it would still need to pay for its fixed costs. So, when a firm is experiencing losses, it must face a question: should it continue producing or should it shut down?

If the firm shuts down, it must still pay the rent, but it would not need to hire labor. Table 5 shows three possible scenarios. In all three cases, the Yoga Center loses money. In all three cases, when the rental contract expires in the long run, assuming revenues do not improve, the firm should exit this business.

In the short run, though, the decision varies depending on the level of losses and whether the firm can cover its variable costs. In scenario 1, the center does not have any revenues, so hiring yoga teachers would increase variable costs and losses, so it should shut down and only incur its fixed costs. If price is below the minimum average variable cost, the firm must shut down. In contrast, in scenario 3 the revenue that the center can earn is high enough that the losses diminish when it remains open, so the center should remain open in the short run.

This example suggests that the key factor is whether a firm can earn enough revenues to cover at least its variable costs by remaining open. Figure 5 illustrates this lesson by adding the average variable cost curve to the marginal cost and average cost curves. This price is below average variable cost for this level of output. If the farmer cannot pay workers the variable costs , then it has to shut down. The intersection of the average variable cost curve and the marginal cost curve, which shows the price where the firm would lack enough revenue to cover its variable costs, is called the shutdown point.

If the perfectly competitive firm can charge a price above the shutdown point, then the firm is at least covering its average variable costs. It is also making enough revenue to cover at least a portion of fixed costs, so it should limp ahead even if it is making losses in the short run, since at least those losses will be smaller than if the firm shuts down immediately and incurs a loss equal to total fixed costs.

However, if the firm is receiving a price below the price at the shutdown point, then the firm is not even covering its variable costs. To summarize, if:. The average cost and average variable cost curves divide the marginal cost curve into three segments, as shown in Figure 6.

First consider the upper zone, where prices are above the level where marginal cost MC crosses average cost AC at the zero profit point. At any price above that level, the firm will earn profits in the short run. If the price falls exactly on the zero profit point where the MC and AC curves cross, then the firm earns zero profits. If a price falls into the zone between the zero profit point, where MC crosses AC, and the shutdown point, where MC crosses AVC, the firm will be making losses in the short run—but since the firm is more than covering its variable costs, the losses are smaller than if the firm shut down immediately.

At any price like this one, the firm will shut down immediately, because it cannot even cover its variable costs. To understand why this perhaps surprising insight holds true, first think about what the supply curve means. A firm checks the market price and then looks at its supply curve to decide what quantity to produce.

This rule means that the firm checks the market price, and then looks at its marginal cost to determine the quantity to produce—and makes sure that the price is greater than the minimum average variable cost.

Watch this video that addresses how drought in the United States can impact food prices across the world. Note that the story on the drought is the second one in the news report; you need to let the video play through the first story in order to watch the story on the drought.

As discussed in the chapter on Demand and Supply , many of the reasons that supply curves shift relate to underlying changes in costs. For example, a lower price of key inputs or new technologies that reduce production costs cause supply to shift to the right; in contrast, bad weather or added government regulations can add to costs of certain goods in a way that causes supply to shift to the left. A shift in costs of production that increases marginal costs at all levels of output—and shifts MC to the left—will cause a perfectly competitive firm to produce less at any given market price.

Conversely, a shift in costs of production that decreases marginal costs at all levels of output will shift MC to the right and as a result, a competitive firm will choose to expand its level of output at any given price. The following Work It Out feature will walk you through an example.

To determine the short-run economic condition of a firm in perfect competition, follow the steps outlined below. Use the data shown in Table 7. Step 1. Determine the cost structure for the firm. For a given total fixed costs and variable costs, calculate total cost, average variable cost, average total cost, and marginal cost. Follow the formulas given in the Cost and Industry Structure chapter.

These calculations are shown in Table 8. Step 2. Determine the market price that the firm receives for its product.

This should be given information, as the firm in perfect competition is a price taker. With the given price, calculate total revenue as equal to price multiplied by quantity for all output levels produced.

You can see that in the second column of Table 9. Step 3. Calculate profits as total cost subtracted from total revenue, as shown in Table Step 4. To find the profit-maximizing output level, look at the Marginal Cost column at every output level produced , as shown in Table 11 , and determine where it is equal to the market price.

The output level where price equals the marginal cost is the output level that maximizes profits. Step 5. Step 6. If the firm is making economic losses, the firm needs to determine whether it produces the output level where price equals marginal revenue and equals marginal cost or it shuts down and only incurs its fixed costs. Step 7. For the output level where marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost, check if the market price is greater than the average variable cost of producing that output level.

As a perfectly competitive firm produces a greater quantity of output, its total revenue steadily increases at a constant rate determined by the given market price.

To change or withdraw your consent choices for Investopedia. At any time, you can update your settings through the "EU Privacy" link at the bottom of any page.

These choices will be signaled globally to our partners and will not affect browsing data. We and our partners process data to: Actively scan device characteristics for identification. I Accept Show Purposes. Your Money. Personal Finance. Your Practice. Popular Courses. Economics Macroeconomics. Key Takeaways In neoclassical economics, perfect competition is a theoretical market structure that produces the best possible economic outcomes for both consumers and society.

In a perfectly competitive market, there are so many firms producing the same products that, in the long-run, none of the firms can attain enough power to influence the industry.

In the long-run, all of the possible causes of economic profits are eventually assumed away in the model of perfect competition. Compare Accounts. The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.

Related Articles. Perfect Competition: What's the Difference? Microeconomics Perfect vs. Imperfect Competition: What's the Difference? Partner Links. Related Terms Monopolistic Competition Definition Monopolistic competition characterizes an industry in which many firms offer products or services that are similar, but not perfect, substitutes.

Understanding Perfect Competition Pure or perfect competition is a theoretical market structure in which a number of criteria such as perfect information and resource mobility are met. That is because the price is determined by supply and demand and does not change as the farmer produces more keeping in mind that, due to the relative small size of each firm, increasing their supply has no impact on the total market supply where price is determined.

Figure 2. Market Price. Since a perfectly competitive firm is a price taker, it can sell whatever quantity it wishes at the market-determined price. Marginal cost, the cost per additional unit sold, is calculated by dividing the change in total cost by the change in quantity. The formula for marginal cost is:. Unlike marginal revenue, ordinarily, marginal cost changes as the firm produces a greater quantity of output.

At first, marginal cost decreases with additional output, but then it increases with additional output. Again, note this is the same as we found in the module on production and costs.

Table 3 presents the marginal revenue and marginal costs based on the total revenue and total cost amounts introduced earlier. The marginal revenue curve shows the additional revenue gained from selling one more unit, as shown in Figure 3. In the raspberry farm example, marginal cost at first declines as production increases from 10 to 20 to 30 packs of raspberries. But then marginal costs start to increase, due to diminishing marginal returns in production.

The reason is since the marginal revenue exceeds the marginal cost, additional output is adding more to profit than it is taking away.

Figure 3. The marginal cost MC curve is sometimes initially downward-sloping, but is eventually upward-sloping at higher levels of output as diminishing marginal returns kick in. In the case of the raspberry farm, this occurs at 80 packs of strawberries. If the farmer started out producing at a level of 60, and then experimented with increasing production to 70, marginal revenues from the increase in production would exceed marginal costs—and so profits would rise.

The farmer has an incentive to keep producing. If the farmer then experimented further with increasing production from 80 to 90, he would find that marginal costs from the increase in production are greater than marginal revenues, and so profits would decline. Table 1 showed that maximum profit occurs at any output level between 70 and 80 units of output. How do we explain this slight discrepancy?

Watch this video to practice finding the profit-maximizing point in a perfectly competitive firm. Clifford reminds us that in a perfectly competitive market, the demand curve is a horizontal line, which also happens to be the marginal revenue. You can use the acronym MR. Improve this page Learn More.

Skip to main content.